Friday, April 29, 2011

Ted Talk Response #5 Ethel

I watched Ethel perform a piece of music with several other people called "Blue Room". It was much different than any other Ted Talk i've ever watched. I ended the video feeling sad, because that's the emotion that the video conveyed. It was a very short video, and i was shocked that there were no words or explanations of the music. I liked it because i could tell that the point was to portray emotion through music instead of words, because i have never seen anything like it. At first i was confused at how short and wordless this Ted Talk was, but as the video went on i began interested in trying to find the meaning of this song. I think it showed sorrow and pain, but i liked how fully open to interpritation it was. Without words it is much easier to form your own opinion, and not having words helped too. I didn't like this talk as much as some of the others i've seen, but i found it very interesting.

Sunday, April 24, 2011

Ted Talk #4 (Clay Shirky)

Clay Shirky's Ted Talk had to do mostly with using the world's free time and talents to create things that whole communities and even the whole world could benefit from. He called the use of the world's free time and talents 'cognitive surplus'. Clay goes on to tell a story about a Kenyan woman creating a website called 'Ushahidi' which takes reports from fields, aggrigates them, and puts them on a map to make available to the entire population(crisis mapping).  She had this idea during a presidential election so that people would have more information on the subject, and in 72 hours her and a few engineers created this website. It's amazing to think that something like that could be done in 72 hours. Clay Shirky also expressed that nothing could be done without two things; human generosity, and digital technology. I thought it was really interesting how different those two things are, but how they play together so well. Technology is communication, yet human generosity is a way of living. So communication and a way to get information out to others, and an act of generosity from a person go hand in hand to create things. I also liked how Clay used his body and hands when he spoke to help express things and to help the audience visualise things, but didn't fidgit. He used a very clear, strong voice that you really couldn't help but listen to. He used story and comparisons to state his points, and they worked well together. I think if the world used more of cognitive surplus, and the balance between digital technology and human generosity, we could create things beyond our imaginations. So far, i think our world uses too much of digital technology, and not enough generosity to balance it out.

Tuesday, April 19, 2011

Ted Talk #3: Daniel Pink

Daniel Pink's ted talk was based on how rewards for good work can have a negative effect overall. The first moment that the camera landed on him, he jumped into a personal story about him starting out as a student in law school. He explained how it wasn't for him, as much as he wanted to succeed, and it was very easilly related to! Daniel used hand motions as he talked, and moved around the stage almost constantly, but didn't seem nervous of fidgety. I liked how confident and comfortable he seemed while giving his presentation, and he made his audience laugh several times. I learned about several studies testing testing how rewards can actually be a disadvantage to productivity. He explained how 8 out of the 9 studies conducted showed that "higher incentive lead to worse performance." He also emphasized that giving rewards to try and increase performance dulls the original thinking and creativity. I liked how he expressed these things as facts, not opinions. He said more than once that these studies and statistics are true facts, not feelings or philosophy. The most interesting part of the presentation was the part where Pink talked about an Australian companie's "Fedex days", and Google's "20% time" that they provided to their employees. During this time, employees were allowed to work on anything they wanted, and many huge ideas came out of these esentially free times. Overall i thought the presentation was very interesting, and Daniel kept me interested the entire time.

Monday, April 18, 2011

Ted talk response #2: "Photos of AIDS".

Kristin Ashburn's Ted Talk was called "Photos Of AIDS". From the moment the camera lands on her, she gets right to the point of her presentation, launching herself and her viewers into her story of visiting Zimbabwe, and being shocked at the amount of HIV positive people. She shared with us that 35% of the entire population in Zimbabwe is HIV positive. Kristin talked for a few minutes, and then showed a slide show of photographs of women, men, and children with AIDS. The slide show was shocking in a way, i wasn't expecting it at all. It was very real photographs that didn't shy away from reality. During the slide show, Ashburn didn't talk once, just letting the images sink into our minds. The silence really emphasized how serious and real HIV is. Kristin's way of talking showed comfort and ease, making me as her viewer feel comfortable too. Throughout the entire presentation she hardly moved her body, and didn't fidgit at all. This presentation was short and right to the point, which kept me much more interested than the last Ted Talk i watched.

Sunday, April 17, 2011

Ted Talk Response #1

The man that gave this speech used several strategies to capture and hold the attention of the audience. He used humor and his easy-going personality to lighten the mood of the room. The man was very casual, and didn't pace or move around a lot during the video. At first, his jokes were funny, and kept me interested. As the speech went on though, the jokes got repetative and kept veering off of his original points on education. His use of quotes from his friends, family, and people like picasso were very interesting, and most of them provoked thought. I learned that many more people are coming to the decision that education needs to change to ensure a brighter future for generations to come. It can no longer be tought to one specific kind of learner, and our educators need to broaden their horizon.